Arbitrage Blog

Read the latest blog post!


The Invisible Workforce

Written by Arbitrage2026-02-17 00:00:00

Arbitrage Blog Image

Family caregiving is often framed as an act of love. But what stays mostly invisible is the economic system that love quietly props up. When an adult child manages medications, drives to appointments, translates medical jargon, handles insurance calls, and sits awake through the night because a parent is at risk of falling, that labor doesn't show up on a paycheck or in GDP. Yet it is real work with real costs - paid in money, time, career momentum, and health.

A major national snapshot from AARP and the National Alliance for Caregiving found that about 53 million adults (more than one in five Americans) had provided care in the prior year. That number is more than just a social statistic; it's an economic indicator. In 2021 alone, AARP estimated family caregivers provided about 36 billion hours of care, valued at roughly $600 billion if you priced those hours at an average hourly rate. Put differently, families are delivering an essential layer of the long-term-care system largely off the books, absorbing tasks that would otherwise be provided by paid home health aides, care managers, drivers, and nurses.


The first invisible cost is the one caregivers feel immediately with out-of-pocket spending. In a national AARP study of caregivers, the typical annual out-of-pocket total was $7,242, and caregivers reported spending an average of 26% of their income on caregiving-related expenses. This cost doesn't just cover obvious medical copays. They often also include groceries, home modifications, transportation, medical supplies, paid help for a few hours of relief, and the recurring purchases that keep daily life functioning. Even if the care recipient has coverage, caregiving creates a second shadow budget, one that competes with rent or mortgage payments, retirement contributions, and children's needs.


Then there's the cost of lost earnings and career disruption. Family Caregiver Alliance reports that 69% of working caregivers say that they have had to rearrange schedules, cut hours, or take unpaid leave to meet caregiving demands. Over time, that can become a compounding penalty with missed promotions, stagnant wages, reduced Social Security credits, and smaller retirement balances. Researchers and policy analysts also track the spillover into the broader economy; one summary estimates employer productivity losses of roughly $33.6 billion per year tied to caregiving-related work disruptions.


For many families, the burden doesn't come in a neat, predictable arc. It arrives as a slow squeeze. Caregiving can stretch for years. KFF has found that a meaningful share of caregivers report financial strain and negative financial impacts such as taking on debt. The invisible cost can also take the form of future fragility because caregivers might drain savings to keep a loved one safe, only to realize they've undercut their own ability to handle a job loss, a medical emergency, or retirement. In other words, caregiving can convert stable households into financially precarious ones without a single dramatic event - just accumulation.


There's also a social invisibility that deepens the economic one: many people don't even identify as caregivers. They describe what they do as just "helping out," until that help becomes a second full-time job. That invisibility matters because it delays support. People don't seek workplace accommodations, training, respite care, or financial resources until they are already beyond overwhelmed. And by then, choices narrow: cutting work hours, turning down assignments, dipping into retirement, or leaving the workforce altogether.


What makes these costs especially hard to measure is that caregiving is not a single task. It is a shifting portfolio of roles that expands as needs change. Caregivers act as a kind of "buffer" against system gaps: they coordinate care, troubleshoot, and fill in when services are unavailable or unaffordable. If the invisible cost of caregiving is built from time, money, and opportunity, then real solutions have to recognize all three. Better access to respite services and reliable home- and community-based care can return time to families. Financial support, including tax credits, direct stipends in some public programs, and simpler benefit navigation, can reduce the out-of-pocket drain. And workplace policies that treat caregiving as a predictable life stage (not a personal failure of "balance") can keep people attached to the labor force without sacrificing the care their families need.


Family caregiving will probably always be, at its core, personal. But the costs shouldn't be borne privately when the benefits are public. The next time we talk about the price of health care or the strain on the eldercare system, it is worth naming the invisible line item that holds everything together: millions of caregivers, doing indispensable work, and paying for it in ways that rarely make the bill.

Like this article? Share it with a friend!